January 10, 2012
Lies My Pastor Told Me: The Conclusion
I started writing this in April of last year, and (after restarting six times) finished writing it in October. Then, I sat on it. For a long while, I wasn’t even sure if I was ever going to make this public, and on more than one occasion (last week, even) I decided that I would shut down my blog without this post ever seeing the light of day.
Everyone has things they believe and things they don’t. All my life I’ve felt like my beliefs were in a minority, no matter what those beliefs were. That being the case, I often feel like the best course of action is to stay relatively quiet. That doesn’t mean I haven’t had the occasional outburst, but on the whole I tend not to say as much as I feel I’d like to. People can believe whatever they’d like to believe, as long as those beliefs don’t infringe upon my own. And if no one wants to hear what I have to say, maybe it’s best to leave things unsaid.
What finally changed my mind was the recent death of a great intellectual, author, and general curmudgeon, Christopher Hitchens. The guy was a bastard, but I respected him greatly — I quoted him extensively at the end of the post. One of the things he had to say was this: “Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence.” I’m taking this to heart.
I’ll have a little more to say afterwards, but let’s dive in. Here is the conclusion to Lies My Pastor Told Me.
——
“Which path should I take?” he asked. “Which one is safe?”
“Take one, and you cannot take the other,” she said. “But neither path is safe. Which way would you walk — the way of hard truths or the way of fine lies?”
- Neil Gaiman, American Gods
——
Every article needs to start with a good hook, and I’m going to go with this: when I was seventeen, a classmate of mine slit his step-mother’s throat, and then proceeded to burn his house down with her body inside. After he had done this, he immediately called the police and confessed his crime, and he’s been locked away ever since.
Obviously, these events shook our small community. The person responsible was well-known as a school bully, though it seemed like he had been making good progress putting those days behind him. I attended our church’s youth group with him, and he was having regular meetings with our associate pastor. He was someone interested in becoming a better person, and religion seemed to be helping with that.
And then there was the murder.
To the police — and at his trial — he described how he had awoken during the night with the terrible feeling that there were demons in the house, forces of evil that wished to do harm. He had no control over his actions. He killed his step-mother in her sleep, then woke his sister and ushered her out of the house. Then, he burnt the house down. The demons that had haunted him his whole life had finally won out.
This was an event that my religion told me was normal, almost expected. Demons stalked us night and day, and we needed to be vigilant in our defence against them. If we’re not vigilant, these are the things that happen — the demons take hold.
Only, no one I knew actually wanted to say that. It’s fine when it’s a story, something passed on by a missionary. Once, our pastor told us that years ago he had faced a demon-possessed girl, the demons making her body fly around the room. That was okay; that was still a story, something that happened at another time in another place. This was not. This was tangible. And it made everyone I knew profoundly uncomfortable.
——
When you’re born into a Christian family, you don’t really have a choice about your religion. As a Christian, it’s your duty to raise your children to be of the same faith. To not do so is the ultimate failing. And yet, I see a lot of my friends struggle with this. “I want to raise my child to be open-minded about religion,” I’ve been told by multiple people. “It’s important to me that my child draw their own conclusions about religion.” And then they post Facebook updates about how proud they are that their child is praying before the age of two, or accepted Jesus into their hearts at the age of three. They want their children to be raised open-minded, but with the assumption that they will naturally become Christians, as Christianity is the true religion. As Stephen Colbert so beautifully put it, “I believe that everyone has the right to their own religion — be you Hindu, Jewish, or Muslim, I believe there are infinite paths to accepting Jesus Christ as your personal saviour.” I was five when I became a Christian, which as far as I knew was some kind of record — it seems like most of my friends were six or seven. Growing up, there’s never really a question of whether or not you’ll be a Christian. It’s all about finding the right moment to declare it — you can’t be so young that people won’t think you’re serious, but you can’t be so old that people think you aren’t dedicated to the cause.
It wasn’t until after the murder that I began to really question my faith in earnest. Before that, I had always had questions, but they were always of “how” rather than “if”. My parents indulged me as best they could, buying me books on Christian theology, philosophy, and prophecy, but reading these only confused me more — even at a young age, my bullshit detector was finely tuned. But the core of my faith remained steadfast.
After the murder, though, I started to look at my own religion a little more closely. I want to be perfectly clear: the murder wasn’t traumatising. It didn’t suddenly make me doubt the existence of God, or make me turn my back on the church, or fill me with anger towards religion. My faith wasn’t shaken. But it did produce an uneasiness in me, a tick on my bullshit detector. It was a precursor. There was a lot about Christianity that was confusing, and as I got older things only got muddier. I switched churches, went on a missions trip to Mexico, and eventually found myself attending Bible school — I knew that a life of ministry wasn’t in the cards for me, but I still wanted to spend at least of year of my life carefully dissecting my own beliefs. After all, if these were philosophies I was going to hold on to for the rest of my life, at the very least I could take a year or two to study the hell out of them.
In the freshmen year, everyone was required to take a class called “Spiritual Formations”. It was focused on discovering your personal connection to your faith and finding, hearing, and understanding the voice of God in your life. A loophole in the system allowed me to opt out, but I experienced it vicariously through my roommate. Once, after class, he stormed into the room — he was normally an extremely reserved person — and proclaimed that it was all bullshit.
In their latest class, they had all been told to find a quiet corner of the college and just sit and listen, making themselves “receptive” to whatever God wanted to tell them. “They said that if we waited,” he told me, “God would speak to us. I waited an hour. God didn’t speak to me. God has never spoken to me. Does God actually speak to people? Am I supposed to hear him? What is he supposed to sound like?”
While I totally understood what he was saying, I never had trouble hearing the voice of God. When I was thirteen, I was just starting to become interested in physics, and it was becoming all the rage to find scientific proof for unscientific concepts (around this time, my church was starting to become infatuated with Kent Hovind, a prominent young-earth creationist and “scientist” with an unaccredited PhD). I remember sketching some ideas down on paper on how, perhaps, heaven and hell were simply different dimensions, and God occupied a higher dimension than us, which explains why he could interact with us but also be unknowable. And then, God spoke to me. He told me that I was a heathen, a weak-willed sinner who was committing blasphemy by even allowing myself to have these ideas. I was demonstrating a lack of faith by feeling this need to explain God. He commanded me to shred the paper, and I did.
Once, driving home from the city, God commanded me to go to Walmart and ask the cashier about Moses and Aaron. I did, and she reminded me about the golden calf. I never really found out why God wanted me to do this.
These situations were normal for me. I’ve always heard the voice of God. And I still do. I still wake during the night, panicked, overcome with guilt for the sins I’ve committed, sins that God will no longer absolve for me. A voice in the back of my mind tells me that I’m disgusting, that I’ve lost my way. My Christian friends would say that this is God trying to get my attention, trying to draw me back to him. I know better. I know it’s a poison at the back of my mind, a poison that I once could live with in peaceful co-existence, but is now slowly killing me.
I was told my entire life that leaving Christianity is easy. The whole world is conspiring to tempt you, to draw you away. All you need to do is allow yourself to slip — to stop praying, to stop reading your Bible, to stop going to church, to stop your devotions — and you’ll be drawn down the wide road. It’s just that simple. But this was a lie. Leaving Christianity is the hardest thing I’ve ever done. Every lie my pastor told me was another drop of poison into my mind, a time-released insurance policy in case I ever left the faith.
These poisons included an incredible degree of self-consciousness and low self-esteem — I’m a sinner, after all, prone to wallow in my fallen ways, and I’ve been told my whole life that I don’t have the power to overcome my faults on my own. I’m disgusting. One of the largest issues I’ve had to deal with is a completely broken sense of sexuality. My entire life I was told over and over that my own body was something I needed to fight against, that natural urges and impulses — from lust to masturbation to sex itself — were the devil trying to lead me astray. Learning to have a normal sex life when you despise your own body is something that’s taken a lot of effort, and I still struggle with occasional feelings of guilt.
(I can hear someone reading this and saying, “Well, it’s too bad that this has been your experience. I was never taught my body was disgusting! I was taught my body was a temple!” Yeah, I was taught my body was a temple. A temple you must keep sanctified and pure, and whose natural inclinations were disgusting and evil. I’m not sure there’s a Christian out there who could say they weren’t taught that lustful thoughts were traps laid to make you “stumble”, and that sex has exactly one context under which it’s acceptable (and is profane in anything but that context). Many people are Christians and aren’t screwed up sexually. But that doesn’t mean the teachings of Christianity foster healthy sexual relationships. I suspect that I am tragically normal.)
When I left college, I decided that what I wanted to do was write a book. It was going to be called “Daft Things”. My plan was to join up with a group called YWAM (Youth With A Mission), a missions group that tends to be a hotbed for extraordinary supernatural events — from faith healings to demon possessions to tangible miracles — and race from location to location, attempting to witness a “miracle” first hand. After all, no miracle has even been properly documented and analysed in the history of the world, and if miracles were supposedly so common, I felt like it would be awesome to write about attempts to confirm these extraordinary claims. I didn’t want to hear about the girl in a distant tribe who was possessed and made to float through the air — I wanted to see it. I wanted to take pictures. I wanted to write an awesome book about one man’s quest to search for, and ultimately fail to find, God. Honestly, I’d still kind of like to do that. But for fairly obvious reasons, I doubt YWAM would take me on anymore. They likely would have when I was fresh out of college. Now… not so much.
Maybe this was something I felt like I needed to do because I knew someone who claimed demons drove him to murder. Or maybe it was just a backlash resulting from my scepticism at the missionaries who visited our church (and once, our own pastor) making ludicrous claims about evil curses and the flying possessed that everyone seemed to believe. For the sake of my own sanity, these were things I needed to discredit. The worst-case scenario was actually stumbling on a real miracle, on something I couldn’t rationally explain — an impossibility in my mind, but still an enchanting thought. Man goes out to disprove God, ends up finding his own faith. It’s the oldest conversion story in the book. It’d be a guaranteed best-seller. I’m not sure what the audience for a failing-to-find-god book would be. Well, me, I guess. I’d read that.
The point is, I wanted to do this knowing that it would be a failing-to-find-god book. I didn’t believe that miracles actually happened. There was just no evidence for it. Even the so-called “miraculous healings” I ran into so often in my daily life had obvious medical explanations, if only you looked closely enough.
Studying the Bible tended to leave me with more questions about my faith than answers. It occurred to me that, even with church, devotions, Bible studies and Sunday school — despite all of this — precious few Christians have read the Bible and understand the basics of their own religion. Everyone around me seemed to have a basic knowledge of the texts, but then just haphazardly assembled their own beliefs based on random verses taken out of context, beliefs poached from their friends, and things they’ve heard said from the pulpit. There seems to be very little agreement as to what Christian beliefs are, but one thing everyone has in common is that their dogma has very little to do with what’s written in the Bible. At least among the people I know, it’s about a “personal relationship” and “simple faith”. Eventually, I grew to understand that everyone invents a god for themselves, much in the same way the early Jews assembled their own faith — taking bits and pieces of the various beliefs around them and wrapping it up into a neat, if not coherent, package. And gradually I grew to understand that these are the only gods there are.
There is no god other than the god we create for ourselves. Every religious person alive invents their own belief system and own god, picking and choosing what their scripture says. If a belief comforts you, gives you a sense of purpose, appends meaning to your existence, then it’s in. Does part of scripture make you uncomfortable? Congratulations, it doesn’t really mean what you think it meant, or it was translated weirdly, or it was written for people of another time.
In church, sermons and sayings tend to repeat, and one you’ll hear on at least an annual basis is this: “When people are asked why they don’t go to church, they say it’s because the church is full of hypocrites. It’s because we don’t practice what we preach!” But that’s not it at all. Somehow, this is one fundamental, overwhelming, all-encompassing point that every Christian seems to get wrong. People don’t think the church is full of hypocrites because the congregation doesn’t practice what they preach. They call them hypocrites because Christians are blissfully unaware of what the Bible even says. They pick and choose things that make them happy and discard things that don’t, all while attempting to say with a straight face that they’re “Bible-believing”. As Penn Jillette so eloquently put it, the fastest way to become an atheist is to read the Bible. So they don’t. They claim that their faith is more personal, more relational. They don’t need some silly, holy, life-encompassing book to tell them about their faith. No, they’re much more comfortable just making it up.
The result of this can be tricky. Religion is like a life-long game of Jenga. You start with a nice little tower, built with the help of your friends and family, and you’re told that it’s totally fine to poke and prod it a bit, but only because it will result in discovering ways to make the tower even stronger. However, it’s vitally important that you not actually alter the tower too much, lest you fall into the sin of redesigning it to suit your own needs. So, you sit there with this tower. Eventually, you start to notice that a couple blocks are out of place — sometimes God is okay with divorce, it’s a little nonsense to take a stand against evolution, and homosexuality isn’t the result of the devil’s lure. You pull out a few blocks and reposition them. Everything’s still okay. But you keep finding blocks that need to move, more and more. You start to realize that things you were taught were wrong, assumptions were incorrect. You keep changing and tweaking, but every time you do the tower becomes less steady. Over time, it starts to lose its structure, until you see that if you make any more changes the tower will fall completely. And then you sit back, look at the tower, and suddenly understand that there never was any tower, just a number of meaningless blocks cleverly arranged. And yet, this was something you’ve been working on your entire life. Simply pushing the tower over, letting it spill to the ground and walking away is… a difficult action.
Last year, I reached that point. I decided that what I wanted to do was attempt to slowly deconstruct the tower, brick by misplaced brick, in hopes of making sense of it all. I called my writings, collectively, “Lies My Pastor Told Me”. In reply to one of the comments left, I said that this was certainly not my coming out as an atheist. Rather, it was important for my sanity to draw attention to the problems I saw in religion, in hopes of saving my own faith.
It didn’t.
The tower fell.
When you first understand that god does not exist, the result is feeling simultaneously like you’re breathing for the first time in your life and the entire weight of the world is crushing you. Things suddenly make sense. A billion contradictions and paradoxes you’ve been trying to reconcile are blown away like dust. Every question you’ve had about god, about faith, about religion, is rendered null. And slowly, you feel the trickle of guilt — religion’s most potent tool — start to slowly dissipate.
But then there’s the crushing despair. You realize that you only have one life to live, and it is finite. When it is over, you return to the dust and your consciousness is no more. When you place a loved one in the ground, you will never share an existence with them again. There is no higher power to absolve you of your transgressions. If you give in to temptation, it is because you are a human being with no supernatural force to scapegoat. Your life has no meaning apart from the meaning you give it.
This is the reason religion exists. I want to run from these realizations. There is a safe place for me, where I can live in exact, calculated, blissful ignorance. Sometimes I dream that I’ve made a horrible miscalculation, that there is a god and an afterlife and everlasting love. When I wake the moment is gone, which brings with it a sad relief. There are so many things about religion and the supernatural that I desperately wish were true. But it is wrong. It is false. And while that may be perfectly fine for some people, it is not okay for me.
And then, things start to come in waves. The despair gives way to beautiful truths. You have a finite life, but we are all living finite lives together, conspiring to pass on our hopes, dreams, and memories in an effort to make existence better. We do not need a higher power to absolve us of our sins — we are both cerebrally and emotionally capable of doing that ourselves. And our lives have exactly the meaning we give it, a meaning we can chose for ourselves and don’t need to find in comforting and contrived lies.
This is followed by another crushing wave. Are these lofty goals? Does this all mean that existence is ultimately random and meaningless? Is the world so cold and mechanical, just atoms and electrical sparks?
C.S. Lewis spent his life as an on-again off-again atheist. Once, he described one of his bouts of atheism as having been a man very angry at God for not existing. I understand that. If only God would exist, I would have answers. I would have meaning. I would have comfort. The wide road was supposed to be the easy journey, but it’s religion that seduces you into false comforts.
And then I look at the world around me. I look at life, at plants and animals. I look at people. I look at rocks and planets and sunsets. I look at profoundly intricate systems a watchmaker could have never dreamed of, beautiful in their complexity and deranged in their execution. I look at tectonic plates pushing high into the air, changing seasons, ocean water that falls from the sky, photons bouncing off wet pavement, magnesium engulfed in flames. I sense invisible sound waves, heat from a distant sphere of plasma, the rush of nitrogen and oxygen through the ether.
And I see Caitlin, her eyes catching mine. She smiles, and I understand that I have meaning. I have comfort. My life has context, and I am now richer for it. There may not be a supernatural, everlasting love, but here on Earth we have something that can be even better.
God does not exist, and with that understanding comes pain and misery, but also hope, joy, and release. If the Christian God were to exist, he would by scriptural necessity be jealous, vengeful, violent, and schizophrenic. He would hate women, command genocides, condone rape, and eternally damn those who never hear his name. He would order his subjects to slit the throats of their own children as a test of their loyalty. He is a monster that commands the worship of billions who find reality to be less comfortable.
Late at night, I would lie awake with all these thoughts bubbling up inside me. “All I really want,” I would tell Caitlin over and over, “is to be done with it. To have religion no longer be a part of my life. I’ve spent so many years trying to understand, trying to come to terms with my own existence. All I want is to be free of this. To not have to think about it ever again, and to simply live my life. To be at peace.”
Today, I take that first step. I replace religion and dogma with wonder and discovery. I seek to understand the world as it is, not as I wish it to be. I embrace ethics and morality given to us not by a creator, but organically sewn into the human race. I return to a place of awe, a tiny spec in a system so large, so complicated, so vast and beautiful that it stretches through unknown times and spaces. It’s a system I have a place in, not as a mindless adherent to an unknown god, but as flesh and blood, a collection of molecules gathered from distant worlds to momentarily become me. From dust to dust. It’s beautiful, and exciting, and — for the moment — even unexpected.
I leave religion behind me. And finally, after so many years of questions and contradictions, I can be at peace.
“We atheists do not require any priests, or any hierarchy above them, to police our doctrine. Sacrifices and ceremonies are abhorrent to us, as are relics and the worship of any images or objects (even including objects in the form of one of man’s most useful innovations: the bound book). To us no spot on earth is or could be ‘holier’ than another: to the ostentatious absurdity of the pilgrimage, or the plain horror of killing civilians in the name of some sacred wall or cave or shrine or rock, we can counterpose a leisurely or urgent walk from one side of the library or the gallery to another, or to lunch with an agreeable friend, in pursuit of truth or beauty. Some of these excursions to the bookshelf or the lunch or the gallery will obviously, if they are serious, bring us into contact with belief and believers, from the great devotional painters and composers to the works of Augustine, Aquinas, Maimonides, and Newman. These mighty scholars may have written many evil things or many foolish things, and been laughably ignorant of the germ theory of disease or the place of the terrestrial globe in the solar system, let alone the universe, and this is the plain reason why there are no more of them today, and why there will be no more of them tomorrow. Religion spoke its last intelligible or noble or inspiring words a long time ago… We shall have no more prophets or sages from the ancient quarter, which is why the devotions of today are only the echoing repetitions of yesterday, sometimes ratcheted up to screaming point so as to ward off the terrible emptiness.”
- Christopher Hitchens
——
In the months since I’ve written this, I’m happy to say that the confliction and pangs of guilt have subsided. The further you find yourself from religion, the more absurd the beliefs you once held appear. You begin to find a meaning and rhythm that wasn’t there before. If faith is the abnegation of responsibility, truth is the practice of it. We are all responsible for our own actions, and there’s something wonderful about that. As a Christian, I heard so many times that the act of giving your burden to God was like having a massive weight lifted from your shoulders. But the weight of a God is infinite and crushing — I’m happy to report that I’m breathing lighter every day.
——
I’ve compiled a short reading list, comprising of the things I’ve read these last few years that have influenced these articles and my own life. If you’d like to get a little further into my head, I highly suggest tracking these down:
How to Read the Bible, by James Kugel
This book should be required reading for anyone who claims to call themselves Christian. It’s an astounding and in-depth look at the books of the Old Testament, who wrote them, why they were written, and how they’ve changed over time.
Blankets, by Craig Thompson
I’m not normally a fan of graphic novels, but Craig Thompson’s autobiographical “Blankets” felt so familiar I couldn’t put it down. Actually — I’ll be honest — I torrented it because I heard it was good, read the first third of it, then actually drove to Chapters that evening to buy a copy. To steal the quote from Amazon: “Thompson himself is the protagonist, and this is his tale of growing up, falling in love (and realizing the physical and moral complications that can imply), discovering the texture and limits of his faith, and arriving at a point from which he can look back at those experiences.”
Foreskin’s Lament, by Shalom Auslander
I probably wouldn’t have started writing Lies My Pastor Told Me if it wasn’t for Auslander. His autobiography is mournful, angry, conflicted and paradoxical, and through it he taught me that struggling with religion isn’t something you have to do in private.
——
Finally, I’m open to any and all comments. You can either leave them here on the blog, or you can e-mail me directly at me(at)aaronhildebrandt.com.
Comments
Leave a comment
Commenting is closed for this article.


Be at peace, my friend. :) I often wish that we were better friends, for I really think we could have been under slightly different circumstances. We would have so much in common, so much to sit around and shoot the breeze about. Who knows? Maybe you’re just a little further along the same path I’m walking. Or maybe it’s the other way around. Who can say? It’s funny that I should spend a few moments today thinking about a friendship that was never quite there in the first place, isn’t it? Maybe one day it could be. :) Nonetheless, we could talk about these things for hours and hours — and not in order to persuade each other, to argue a point of view, but instead to, as you say, discover and investigate the wonder of the world together. And what greater and rarer wonder could there be than simply being at peace? Your clarity is an intensely beautiful thing.
I’m glad you decided to post this essay, Aaron. I don’t know you, but I can certainly identify with much of your story. I’m also a huge fan of Blankets by Craig Thompson, so I had best check out the other two books on your reading list (I realize they’re not necessarily related outside of their degree of impact on your thinking).
Simply wonderful. This echos a lot of the process I’ve experienced over the past years or so. It’s strange, lately I’ve been daydreaming about what it would be like to relive my short stint at P. Bible College, only, with the perspective I have now. Some of my most unkind actions, worst choices, and deepest regrets were made whilst trying to hear and be true to “God’s” voice. Folly. I’m happier and more free now than I ever was. Although, I still have some work to do in rebuilding the extensive damage done to my self-esteem, confidence, and womanhood. Loads of support to you in your journey.
“…over the past -seven-years or so”.
Also, thank you for the book suggestions. This is the only post I’ve read from your blog, and I believe I’ll be digging into the archives now. I’m forwarding this to some friends who are struggling with some of the same things. Thank you for boldly posting your story.
Hey Aaron, I don’t have a lot to say, but I wanted to say that I read this and thought it was really well-written. It takes some courage to write about something like this, and it takes some serious thought and effort to write about it so clearly. Bravo, my friend. I wish I had handled my own religious “coming out” a little better. :)
Very well said my friend. Until reading this, I wasn’t aware your beliefs had changed so much over the past few years. As someone who was often the only non-religious person in the room growing up, I slowly stopped discussing religion with close, religious friends as it often left both parties frustrated. Clearly we could have had some interesting conversations had I known what personal journey you were on.
Also, this is one of my favorite people: http://youtu.be/6RjW5-4IiSc
The article is beautifully written and is a lovely contribution to human spirituality. I too have been on this path, and because of age find myself a little further along it. What I have found over time is this, The more I gave up religion, the more I gave up the rules and regulations, the judgement and the guilt, the anger and the pity, the closer and closer I came to deity. I will not use the word God. God is the Christian God. I have come to realize that if I can describe God, then He is NOT all powerful and omnipotent. I can’t conceive of God, but when I give up the human invention of religion, I can feel Deity. I think its wonderful that you are experiencing some peace, because now the real journey begins! Wishing you wholeness!
I read this with sadness and with joy, dear friend. It’s a story so familiar, ressonating with my own life in many places. When you write the “I did not find god” book, I will read it.
Well put. My experience (save for the classmate story) was quite a bit like this, though it was Carl Sagan whose arguments I couldn’t defeat. I applaud you for having the courage and intellectual honesty to continue along the path of examination wherever it lead. Turning the gaze of a critical mind inward is incredibly painful, especially when it results in changing a whole worldview. That may have a great deal to do with the fact that there are few who leave the religion of their childhood. I am glad to see that you have discovered some of the ways that life does not change after leaving the faith, but in fact grows even more special—things that many religious people find difficult or even impossible to accept about those who no longer believe.
The title of your series reminds me of one of the emotions I felt as I read and researched when I was trying to articulate my loss of faith. I became so angry that the apologist and intelligent design books I had read to defend my faith contained so many lies and distortions. I was not angry that the arguments were invalid or rested upon falsehoods, but that many of the premises were lies by authors who should have known better.
What a frank, cogent summarization of your journey. I understand perfectly what you mean; leaving Christianity was the most terrifying thing I’ve done, and I still feel the toxicity of the poison that was injected into me my entire life. I suppose the hardest part for most of us who have moved beyond faith (or certainty, at least) is sharing the divergence of our beliefs with those whom we’ve shared belief systems with, knowing that they will feel let down. Someone who steps out of the herd and engages his own mind to arrive at rational conclusions seems to be a rare find, and so I found this post to be well-written, and, dare I say, inspiring(?!).
Well-written and, interestingly, without equivocation. You and Hitchens are men of great faith – the new evangelists of anti-religion.
Wait wait wait wait. Voice? Like literal audible voice?
Like if I gave you a series of voices of different pitches, would you be able to say, “Higher than this one, lower than that?”
I’m a friend of a friend, and I just want to say that I am a Christian and I really enjoyed this post. I have been through periods of agnosticism, and identify with many of your feelings. Though I didn’t leave my faith completely, I did make a significant change to another denomination (I loathe the word ‘religion’ myself). Though we came to different conclusions about spirituality specifically, I identify with many of your conclusions, especially about maintaining a state of wonder about the world. Thank you for sharing your journey and articulating what many of us have felt.
I hope that your friends and family who are still Christians have been receptive and accepting towards your change in beliefs. With as well as you’ve articulated your feelings, they should be.
Thanks to everyone who read, shared, commented, and e-mailed. The response has been overwhelming. I’m hoping to reply to everyone in time, but for now: thank you. You’re all amazing, and it means so much to me to have such strong reactions from so many people. Keep the questions and comments coming — I promise I’ll get back to as many of you as I can.
Aaron –
I don’t know you, except through this blog. I’m a former Manitoba Bible Belter, now Vancouverite – via Winnipeg, (Hell, I even did a DTS with YWAM along the way too) so I get the context of which you write. I became captivated by your journey through reading your “Lies my Pastor Told Me” series.
This conversation intrigues me greatly- mostly because in the past several years since leaving church, I’ve been happier and more at peace than I ever have before. I left church and not faith, so our stories differ a little, but there are many similarities. I also have people in my life who have walked away from faith in the past few years as well. You know what I see? People who are enjoying their lives, their partners, and their existence much more than they ever did before. So I get it.
I have a question about where Caitlin has played into all of this… meaning – she must be on her own journey too. I recognize and respect that her story is hers alone to tell, so I’m not prodding, I just wonder how walking through this affects relationship.
Thank you for exposing yourself like this. It’s been a courageous offering.
Evan: Every time we talk, no matter how little, I always secretly hope that something is going to cause you to end up in Vancouver so we can give honest friendship a real chance :P Regardless, I really appreciate that you’ve always been there to help me sort out my own head. So… Vancouver’s lovely. Just sayin’.
Tom: I really, really recommend Foreskin’s Lament. It’s brutal in its honesty, and it’s a reminder that not everyone makes it out of this in one piece. Let me know if you reading, I’d love to hear your thoughts.
Kelsey: One of the best results of writing this is the discovery that I’m not alone. There are so many people who have gone through the exact same deconversion as me, but they’re largely silent about it. Or they look back on it with cynicism and spite. As a Christian, you keep feeling like there’s really no such thing as truly leaving religion — it’s awesome to hear from so many people that did exactly that.
Liz: Thank you :) “Vancouver’s lovely” also applies to you. Just so you know.
Brad: I’ve been meaning to tell you something important — I might as well tell you here. As a Christian, a weird figure I was told over and over is that, on average, people convert to Christianity after seven genuine encounters with Christians. Assuming I was one of those seven for you, I TAKE IT BACK. Do NOT count me as one of the seven. I’m sorry for the 14% I contributed to your (inevitable?) conversion, and I’ll do anything in my power to make sure you don’t hit 100%. Though growing up in Niverville I’m not sure how you avoided the other six so far.
Jayne: You’re right — I’m not remotely done my journey, and I honestly can’t say where it will lead me. The important thing is that here and now I know exactly where I am. If I learn things that shine a new light on what I know, I’ll adjust my path accordingly. If I learn I’m wrong, I’ll work to learn what’s right. Though I can conclusively say that none of the paths I see ahead of me return to religion.
Mari: I’ll let you know when it’s written. Thanks for all the support you’ve shown me over the years.
Chad: You and Gloria have been so amazing. I feel like there were a lot of us attending Bible college around the same time who struggled with very similar issues of faith… but maybe that’s always true? Regardless, I’m glad that we managed to be honest with our beliefs, regardless of how painful it may have been.
Blaine: It is hard. Before I posted this, Caitlin and I actually talked to our parents (and I talked to my siblings) to explain what it is I was about to say. It was extremely frightening, and there was certainly a lot of disappointment. Luckily, no excommunications. I joke, but I’ve read enough stories of people who had things go very, very poorly when they announced their atheism.
Derek: Wow. That’s probably some of the best praise that’s ever been heaped on me. Thanks.
Ryan: It’s kind of like a cross between Beaker (from The Muppets) and Seal.
Becca: The response from my friends has been more positive than I ever thought it could be. My family is a little hurt and in definite disagreement — I think most of them hope, or expect, that this is a “phase”.
Karla: Caitlin also did a DTS, before we started dating. And we also relocated from Winnipeg to Vancouver. As far as her role in all this, we’ve discussed it at length and she’s decided to stay relatively quiet. But rest assured that she’s been on a journey of her own (apart from my own), and she is completely supportive of everything I’ve written. Honestly, our beliefs are probably closer now than they’ve ever been. She’s been an absolutely amazing partner, and I couldn’t have written this without her.
After we discussed this one-on-one, I’d just like to say that I sincerely hope your curiosity about religion stays. Otherwise how else will I hear about movie protagonists as a Jesus figure? :)
interesting path. I guess I was always more simple, I never had a problem or double about Jesus as a prophet and the writings that are ascribed to his followers.
Ha ha, that’s an interesting factoid ;) In all honesty though, I loved growing up in Niverville. Sure, I always found the evangelical worldviews a bit cooky, but it was extremely rare that I felt actively criticized for not sharing in the weekly worship of the local sky-god (sorry, sometimes its fun to condescendingly regionalize a global religion). I think a big part of it had to do with how accepting and kind Mennonites are CULTURALLY (differentiating between the Mennonite culture and religion here). I’m sure growing up as a non-believer in a particularly evangelical corner of the States could have been a bit different!
In any case, it sounds like this wasn’t a decision you made lightly, and it also sounds like you came to it on your own as opposed to having someone in your life coerce you into it. There’s an interesting conversation between Richard Dawkins and Neil deGrasse Tyson online somewhere. Tyson argues with Dawkins that hammering away at hard-line believers with a big evolutionary hammer only breeds misunderstanding and anger between the two parties. The best thing the scientific community can do is give people: 1) The intellectual skills required to analyze the world around them, 2) Instill a sense on wonder about the universe, and 3) Help people become comfortable with the unknown (reduce the urge to insert God when things feel overwhelming). The deeply ingrained presuppositions that develop in our heads from birth, religious or otherwise, don’t react well to being hammered away at from the outside. We all have to work at it from the inside.
The one thing that I always have to tell myself when things get overwhelming is that the Universe doesn’t “owe” us anything. Our brains aren’t necessarily designed to grasp all of the grand concepts that thrash about around us. We aren’t at some peak of evolution, but immersed in a dynamic process that is still taking place every second of every day. We don’t have a “destiny”, and we may have to accept that there is some knowledge we won’t crack for a long time (if ever?).
Formulating a rational and naturalist viewpoint is a community effort; thousands of scientists, philosophers, historians, etc. working in their own specialized fields; trusting one another, challenging each other’s findings, and collaborating towards a greater understanding of our world. That’s the sort of trust I have “faith” in, though I hate to use the word.
Beautifully put. I agree completely. It’s like I said: it’s about replacing dogma with wonder and discovery, and this is one of the most constructive things atheists can teach religious people. Honestly, it’s the reason I’m an atheist — I was taught to inspect and challenge the world around me, then adjust my beliefs accordingly.
That’s quite a manifesto….I admire your tenacious pursuit of truth, I consider myself as on that journey as well. Sounds like your faith (religion?) has undergone some catacalysmic changes but it is difficult to fully understand without operational definitions of these extremely ambiguous terms. The book you want to write, it’s been done – but I would still like to read it! Maybe Lee Strobel’s “Case for Faith” can be a starting point for what to do – or what not to do. There are millions of twenty-somethings that are experiencing the same thing Aaron as you may very well know. You’re smart – you’ll figure it out.
P.S. Just wondering how, as humans, we are able to “cerebrally and emotionally” absolve our own sins?
I have nothing kind of say about Lee Strobel, and I think you have a pretty good idea why. But you’re right — it does have similarities.
In terms of forgiving yourself, I actually wrote extensively about it in part 6. I’ll re-post it here:
Hey Aaron, I’ve been anticipating this post. I’m so glad you finally posted it. I admire your brain. and your guts.
Aaron, you are going to have to spell out the Lee Strobel diatribe for me and as for faith and religion, I would still like to hear your definition, all I see so far is a few fine sounding platitudes…..
In short, Lee Strobel is uneducated and willfully ignorant. He writes entire books about subject matters he doesn’t understand, only presents one viewpoint, and backs up his view by quoting crackpots and calling them “respected scientists”. If someone fact-checked his books before they were published, there would have been nothing left to publish. I don’t want to ramble about this too much, though — a quick Google search will pop up a hundred sites detailing his nonsense. Actually, now that I check, three of the first six results are sites debunking pretty much every thing he’s ever said.
As for definitions. I’d say “faith” is a belief held regardless of evidence — either a belief that has lacked evidence or has active evidence against it.
“Religion” is a set of held beliefs and/or practices relating to the supernatural.
They’re pretty broad definitions, but they’re broad terms. None of this “Christianity isn’t a religion because it’s a relationship” nonsense.
Is there anything in particular you wanted me to clarify?
I read a Lee Strobel book once. I think it may have been the Case for Faith. It was like a mime had written a book to prove he’s in an invisible box.
Lee Stobel holds a masters degree in law from Yale, the most prestigious law school in the U.S. ….if that’s uneducated, I’d hate to think of what that makes you and I….so much for ‘fact-checking’. Some of the critiques I read are valid and may not necessarily convert the ‘hard core’ atheist adherents however the objections which comprise the content of his book are a good starting point for discussion. It makes sense that your definitions of faith and religion are identical. I agree with your definition of faith but I would differentiate religion as the practices observed as a result of faith. So, to clarify, if your faith is not placed in ‘God’, (forgive the capital), are you saying that you do not have a faith or would you say you place your faith in yourself?
I’m completely aware of Strobel’s Masters — having a Masters in a subject matter completely unrelated to anything you’ve ever written a book on doesn’t make you an expert. I stand by what I said — he’s completely uneducated in anything remotely relevant. It’s also worth noting that he has a Masters in Studies in Law, not Law, and that his only work experience after that was as a journalist, and then a pastor. He has zero credentials other than his capacity for believing things strongly. His books are as good a place to start discussions of faith as Kent Hovind is a good place to start discussions of Young-Earth Creationism — he may have a PhD, but that doesn’t mean every word he’s written isn’t crazy.
I know I’m going too hard on him. I’m sure Strobel’s written some good words. But they’re marbles buried in dirt. In my mind, he’s the Stephanie Meyer of Christian literature — so much that they’ve written is so awful that I’m willing to completely disregard them as writers with not much room for reprieve.
I think I’d accept defining religion as “the practices observed as a result of beliefs held without, or in spite of, evidence”. Kind of wordy, but it sounds about right.
I don’t consider myself as having faith in any traditional religious sense — it’s one of the reasons many atheists actively identify themselves as “skeptics”. I’d put myself in with that crowd. “Faith in yourself” is a really strange concept. I’m not sure anyone could say that they “believe something about themselves regardless of evidence”. I’ve heard Christians use similar phrases before — “atheism is placing faith in yourself” or “atheism is about being your own god”, but I’ve never actually heard any atheists describe themselves that way. There’s this belief among many Christians that if you don’t consider God to be the ruler of your life, then you must have replaced him with something, and that something is likely selfish. But that just isn’t the case.
The funny thing about this is that when I read your other posts and I think I commented on them fairly often. Maybe all of them? Anyway, I didn’t feel as compelled to respond on this one as much. Perhaps it’s a part of my nature to see where the story is going from five chapters away and I want to say, “Can we just hurry this all along?”
I’m glad that you have pursued your line of thought to the end and that you were able to shed the destructive system that can be found in religion.
I have a question, is there anything that you’re going to keep with you as a positive thing you’ve learned from the church or the Bible or the story of Jesus, or is it just one of those things where there’s no point when you look at the whole and it’s wrong?
Also, are you keeping any of the writings from this blog or are you deleting them forever?
Thank-you, dear Aaron. Now I understand. Friends like you and Cait force me to keep fighting and speak truth.
Excellent essay. I found out about it via your recent comment at FriendlyAtheist, and just wanted to let you know another person read all of it, and found it moving and wonderful. Your descriptions of the wonder and joy of the actual, existing world are delightful and well-spoken.
I’ll pass this on to my local atheist group.
Welcome to the world.
Dave: I feel like the answer I’m supposed to give is “it’s a good book with lessons and morals that can still be applied today,” but honestly, I don’t think I believe that. I think there are many good lessons that can be learnt from a variety of religious texts, but it’s worth noting that there’s way more that’s bad about the Bible than good. Even a lot of the “positive teachings” are of dubious morality and part of a system built on a foundation of guilt and the threat of eternal punishment. If you want to portray the Bible as a good and moral book, you need to strip it of 99% of its content and all of its context, in which case you’re essentially reinterpreting what it’s saying anyway. In terms of historial or religious texts and the moral lessons that can be gleaned from them, I think the Bible is pretty far down the list. “Do unto others” is fine and all, but I think it’s cherry-picking from a pretty sparse tree, and it’s nothing that hasn’t been said or written by wiser people.
Allison: Likewise. I love that we ended up on opposite sides of the fence, but you’ve always been willing to listen and have very little tolerance for bullshit. Religion needs more people like you; the pursuit of truth is something we’ll always have in common.
Jesse: Thanks. Feel free to share it — and, of course, I’d love to hear what anyone has to say. I’m still new to this whole atheism thing, and right now the best thing people can do is give me feedback.